Evaluation of a peer-support, 'mentor mother' program in Gaza, Mozambique; a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Retention in prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV programs is critical to reduce vertical transmission. To addresses challenges with retention, Mozambique launched a peer-support program in 2018, in which HIV-positive mothers provide adherence support as mentor mothers (MMs) for HIV-positive pregnant and lactating women and HIV-exposed and infected children. METHODS: A descriptive qualitative evaluation was conducted across nine facilities in Gaza Province to assess the acceptability and barriers to implementation of the mentor mother program (MMP) among those receiving services and providing services. In-depth interviews and focus group discussions were conducted with MMs, MM supervisors, health care workers (HCWs), HIV-positive mothers enrolled in the MMP, HIV-positive mothers who declined MMP enrollment, and key informants involved in the implementation of the program. Thematic analysis identified emerging recurrent themes and patterns across the participants' responses. Data were collected between November-December 2020. RESULTS: There were initial challenges with acceptability of the MMP, especially regarding confidentiality concerns and MM roles. Sharing additional information about MMs and making small changes during the beginning of the MMP resulted in generally high acceptance of the MMP. HIV-positive mothers reported that counseling from MMs improved their understanding of the importance of anti-retroviral treatment (ART) and how to take and administer ART. HIV-positive mothers reported having reduced guilt and shame about their HIV-status, feeling less alone, and having more control over their health. MMs shared that their work made them feel valued and decreased their self-stigmatization. However, MMs also reported feeling that they had inadequate resources to perform optimal job functions; they listed inadequate transportation, insufficient stipends, and false addresses of clients among their constraints. Overall, HCWs felt that their workload was significantly reduced with MM support and wanted more MMs in the community and health facility. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that the MMP was considered a substantive and highly valued support to HIV-positive mothers, resulting in increased ART literacy among patients, improved self-reported well-being and sense of community and reduced feelings of isolation. Recommendations include strengthening MM training, increasing financial and materiel resources, additional information provided to newly enrolled mothers and support for the male partners.

HIV community index testing reaches proportionally more males than facility-based testing and is cost-effective: A study from Gaza province, Mozambique.

BACKGROUND: In Mozambique, 38.7% of women and 60.4% of men ages 15-59 years old living with HIV do not know their HIV status. A pilot home-based HIV counseling and testing program based on index cases in the community was implemented in eight districts in Gaza province (Mozambique). The pilot targeted the sexual partners, biological children under 14 years old living in the same household, and parents (for pediatric cases) of people living with HIV. The study aimed to estimate the cost-efficiency and effectiveness of community index testing and compare the HIV testing outputs with facility-based testing. METHODS: Community index testing costs included the following categories: human resources, HIV rapid tests, travel and transportation for supervision and home visits, training, supplies and consumables, and review and coordination meetings. Costs were estimated from a health systems perspective using a micro-costing approach. All project costs were incurred between October 2017 and September 2018 and converted to U.S. dollars ($) using the prevailing exchange rate. We estimated the cost per individual tested, per new HIV diagnosis, and per infection averted. RESULTS: A total of 91,411 individuals were tested for HIV through community index testing, of which 7,011 were newly diagnosed with HIV. Human resources (52%), purchase of HIV rapid tests (28%) and supplies (8%) were the major cost drivers. The cost per individual tested was $5.82, per new HIV diagnosis was $65.32, and per infection averted per year was $1,813. Furthermore, the community index testing approach proportionally tested more males (53%) than facility-based testing (27%). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that expansion of the community index case approach may be an effective and efficient strategy to increase the identification of previously undiagnosed HIV-positive individuals, particularly males.